﻿<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Case on Point: Recent Comments</title><link>http://blog.thecaselawfirm.com</link><description /><generator>Quick Blogcast</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:07:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Comment on Super Lawyers Rising Star 2010</title><link>http://blog.thecaselawfirm.com/2010/01/18/super-lawyers-rising-star-2010.aspx#comment-2739233</link><dc:creator>jack</dc:creator><description>could not open; but congratulations.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.thecaselawfirm.com/2010/01/18/super-lawyers-rising-star-2010.aspx#comment-2739233</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:40:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on Ledbetter decision discussed in 'The New York Times'</title><link>http://blog.thecaselawfirm.com/2009/01/06/ledbetter-decison-discussed-in-the-new-york-times.aspx#comment-1690616</link><dc:creator>Alan Rosenblatt</dc:creator><description>If you want to email Congress and press them to pass the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act, as well as grab a cool wage gap calculator, visit &lt;a href="http://www.OutoftheWayofFairPay.org"&gt;http://www.OutoftheWayofFairPay.org&lt;/a&gt;.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.thecaselawfirm.com/2009/01/06/ledbetter-decison-discussed-in-the-new-york-times.aspx#comment-1690616</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:01:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Comment on MANDATORY ARBITRATION PROVISIONS IN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS</title><link>http://blog.thecaselawfirm.com/2008/11/07/mandatory-arbitration-provisions-in-employment-contracts.aspx#comment-1513516</link><dc:creator>john fattes</dc:creator><description>Other than AFA making mandatory arbitration clauses unenforceable, what does it substitute, if anything? Does NELA have a better option for a prospective employee to bring with him/her to the 'bargaining table'? I totally understand the need for an employer to want arbitration; it makes life simpler, takes less time and is less costly. Lawyers are expensive, especially when going to court. This may be a lawyer's job, but it is not the employer's job. He/She is running a business. Making arbitration fairer (more fair) is a better goal than just making it unenforceable because everyone needs to get on with their lives. Keeping this outcome in mind, a number of options are possible including arbitration, jury trial, or a golf shot for a million dollars. Take your pick.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.thecaselawfirm.com/2008/11/07/mandatory-arbitration-provisions-in-employment-contracts.aspx#comment-1513516</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:38:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>